Working for a Teflon Don
Working for a Teflon Don shares an inside view (with updates)of a former employee of a large corporation, a highly regarded airline who originally faces retaliation for initially speaking up on disparate treatment and discrimination in the workplace of not just a large corporation ,the largest employer in the employees state and a corporation that has an indescribable amount of power and influence. They are untouchable! This pulls back the curtain on Post-Employment Retaliation.
Overview
Kissing the ring of a Teflon Don
This was my mission statement from February of 2023 and sadly my plight and my mission remains the same.
A bi-weekly submission of tracks of a first-hand account of bullying used as a tactic by an employer and the dangerous alliances that they have as protectors from the truth. This details conspiracy to harm. This will be about targeting, workplace mobbing, bullying, and the scary tactics that are used in addition to Gaslighting to deter an employee from exposing in a civil suit the hush hush power and influence that an airline has to destroy the credibility of a former employee who is/was a Pro-Se Litigator and now in 2024 the former employee trying to move forward and obtain and keep employment in a city where this former employer is king. You will learn about abuse of power and something not often discussed post -employment retaliation and backlisting. I am literally bracing for their next tactic against me.
This series will hopefully show that their needs to be
Protections in place for non-government employee Whistleblowers.
- Pro-Se clinics set up in every state.
- Protections for non-interference with an employee’s chosen Mental Health Providers.
- A need for the return of employee ran EAP programs.
- A creation of specific laws to prevent WORKPLACE BULLYING.
- Clear laws against and more dialogue if any exist with and amongst policy makers on Post-Employment Retaliation.
- A Bill for Business Travelers rights that encompass a right to a hotel guests’ privacy and access to any complaints or reports that a hotel provides to their employers.
This series will expose the dark-side of a highly regarded company and the lengths that they will go to protect their image and the real truth about their culture. It will show how other companies will fall in line to keep or gain a contract even if it means aiding with destroying a person both mentally and financially.
Episodes
Jun 13, 2026
Jun 13, 2026
23 min
On June 13, 2026, the narrator begins releasing audio tapes and documents to expose a campaign of whistleblower retaliation. They describe discovering false and misleading entries on court dockets—manufactured arrests, incorrect charges, and fabricated garnishments—planted to discredit and blacklist them.The episode includes a recorded call with court staff who confirm inconsistencies but cannot explain the origin of the errors. The narrator plans to document the record, pursue a federal complaint, and protect themselves while preparing a larger account of these events.
Feb 12, 2026
Feb 12, 2026
17 min
In this episode a daughter speaks with the Atlanta Cancer Care Center to challenge the denial of care for her mother, alleging manipulated medical records, poor communication, and prior federal complaints.
She requests an immediate reconsideration, requests record and call reviews, and warns of escalation if the situation is not resolved within 24–48 hours.
Feb 12, 2026
Feb 12, 2026
2 min
A caller asks John about staff tenure and a recent representative who could not find a letter related to the caller’s mother and Dr. Arendt.The caller notes uncertainty about dates (possibly July or August 2023), reports the representative said Dr. Arendt wasn’t present, and that no record of the correspondence exists in the system.The caller plans to pull further information, wait for Ms. Montella’s callback, and seeks clarification on appointment notes and communications.
Feb 12, 2026
Feb 12, 2026
7 min
Nicollet calls the clinic about her mother’s care after being told a referral is required and raises concerns about a former doctor’s misconduct. She describes repeated problems drawing her mother’s blood, a nurse’s urgent recommendation for hematology and the clinic’s failure to offer alternative access that led to an emergency transfusion.
Lola demands a review of the notes, asks to speak with an administrator, and requests that the clinic call back to clarify whether her mother can return and to address the alleged improper handling of her care.